# BuxUp — Questions preserved for later versions Updated 3 November 2026. These questions are parked deliberately and do not block the first UK/English, single-user, draft-to-email pilot. Original answers remain in BuxUp_Product_Questions.md. No future feature below is promised for this pilot. ## Explicitly revisit: campaign results The original question and your answer are preserved below. ### 24. Which campaign results do you want to see inside BuxUp? Choose the outcomes you need in the first version. Would your team enter those results, or must they arrive automatically? If you want to track good inquiries, what makes an inquiry useful to the provider? **Example:** “Initially, show spend, inquiries, and booked calls. Our manager enters a weekly update. A useful inquiry is from a business in a supported country that needs the advertised service.” [Original answer preserved in the local questionnaire.] Later follow-ups: Which numbers should BuxUp collect, where will they come from, and what counts as an eligible inquiry or an onboarded customer? For example, manually enter booked calls first, then connect actual campaign results later. ## Explicitly revisit: changes after approval and live advertisements ### 25. What should happen if an offer changes after approval or while an ad is running? Should Hermes notify someone, prepare a replacement draft, mark the ad as needing another review, or also stop the running ad where BuxUp has that ability? **Example:** “If the offer expires, notify the campaign manager immediately and prepare a replacement draft. The manager handles stopping the ad.” Automatic Hermes improvements are already agreed; this question is about actions affecting a live advertisement. [Original answer preserved in the local questionnaire.] Later follow-ups: If an offer expires after an ad is published elsewhere, should the system only notify you, draft a replacement, or pause the ad where it has that ability? Who may take each action? ## Explicitly revisit: recurring information checks ### 27. When should Hermes revisit a client’s information? Should it check again only when a new campaign starts, or also check selected offers regularly while campaigns are active? If there is no active work, should it still look for changes? **Example:** “Recheck an offer before every new campaign and once a week while its ads are running. Do not keep researching inactive clients.” [Original answer preserved in the local questionnaire.] Pilot default: reuse saved domain information and check relevant offers, features, or conflicting facts when starting a new campaign. No ongoing monitoring job is assumed. Later decide how often active and inactive clients should be checked. ## Canada and other countries Original Q12 is resolved for the pilot: UK only. Preserve international scope for a later version rather than keeping a multi-country selector in the first build. - Which country should follow the UK: Canada or somewhere else? - For Canada, which provinces and business audiences should come first? For example, an Ontario campaign and a Quebec campaign may need separate research and wording. - Should one campaign contain separate country/province versions, or should each market get its own campaign? - Can individual country versions be approved separately when multi-country work is introduced? - Which client facts are reusable across countries, and which offers/services are market-specific? ## Multiple languages Original Q13 is resolved for the pilot: English only. - Which language should come next, and for which country or audience? - Should Hermes translate an approved English ad or create an independently adapted version? - Who checks wording and text embedded in images when you do not read that language? - Should every language version have its own approval? For example, English copy can be ready while French copy still needs review. ## Campaign chat and detailed editing Q17 explicitly places chat in the next iteration. Q18 confirms button-based platform redos for the pilot. - Should chat only change the selected campaign, with no access to another campaign's conversation? - What should messages trigger: rewrite text, change an image, research a claim, or rethink the campaign? - Should a user confirm the proposed change before the agent acts, or should it create a new draft immediately? - Should users be able to edit copy directly and replace an image themselves? - How should the app distinguish a campaign-only request from a lasting client preference? - Example to revisit: “Make the Instagram ad more formal, but keep the LinkedIn version unchanged.” What should happen to the report and approval state? ## Publishing, sending, and live campaign status Q16 and Q22–23 deliberately stop the pilot at the provider domain and a ready-to-send email draft. - Should BuxUp eventually create a draft inside your email account, send an approved email, or continue using downloads? - Should it read replies and suggest a client-approval record, or should you always record the decision yourself? - Which ad platform should support direct publishing first, and who may launch, schedule, pause, or spend money? - How should externally published ads be recorded as Running: a manual link, a platform confirmation, or both with distinct labels? - Are landing-page creation and business-inquiry forms part of a later release? ## Lead generation, traffic, and affiliate outcomes Q8 enables these as optional strategy modes now. Financial tracking and customer-acquisition operations remain future decisions. - For lead generation, what business details should an inquiry provide, who qualifies it, and where is it handed over? - For traffic campaigns, which agreed visit/click outcome is valuable, and how is it measured? - For affiliate marketing, what counts as a payable introduction and who confirms it? - Should agreements and earnings be tracked in BuxUp? For example, payment on an accepted lead is different from recurring revenue after onboarding. - Which report links each advertisement to an accepted customer or payment under that agreement? ## Teammates and client access Q4–7 select one user and one permission level. No colleague or client portal is required in the pilot. - If teammates are introduced, who can see all clients and who sees only assigned work? - Would clients still approve by email, or should private review links/accounts be introduced? - Would marketing and compliance reviewers have separate decisions, or a single combined client decision? ## Further creative options and operating preferences - Does TikTok eventually need a finished video, narration, subtitles, or only an image/storyboard? - Should a campaign produce several competing creative directions rather than one copy/image per platform? - Should a failed image be substituted with a verified alternative generator, or remain unavailable until retried? - Beyond the separate Hermes dashboard, would campaign-ready notices or summaries be useful by email? - Revisit preparation-time targets, long-document handling, spending preferences, and retention only if real pilot use shows a need; no product count/spend caps or automatic expiry are currently selected. ## How to resume Choose a section when that version is planned. The original question numbers are kept so new answers can be traced back. No answers are required here to publish the revised first implementation draft.